Post by Hibbard, BrandonHello Aditya,
That is interesting. I tested this on my local Postgres 10, and the
fields do populate. When I am connected to my Postgres 9.5 server, the
fields do not populate. They populated in pgAdmin 4 version 3.2 for this
same database, so I am not sure what is wrong. Any ideas?
ticket https://redmine.postgresql.org/projects/pgadmin4.
releases.
Post by Hibbard, BrandonBrandon
*Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2018 5:48 AM
*Subject:* Re: v3.3 Auto complete broken
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:57 AM Akshay Joshi <
Hi Brandon
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:22 PM Hibbard, Brandon <
Hello Akshay and pgAdmin support,
I am on version 3.4 now, and the auto complete is listing the tables in
the schema, but it is not listing the fields in the table. Is this still
an open bug?
Are you talking about listing the fields in the table for auto
complete? If yes then It's working for me. To see the fields in the table
using auto complete you will have to create an alias for the table name.
Please see the attached screenshots.
I have also noticed an odd formatting behavior when there are nested
functions. An example is Upper(trim(b.source)). At the end of this line,
if you enter down, the auto indent is way off and continues to be for the
following lines. If you add a space between the last two parenthesis like
Upper(trim(b.source) ), the auto indent works as expected.
For this please create a new RM
We have a RM raised for this problem -
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3583. It will be fixed when
CodeMirror's next version is available as it is fixed there.
Thanks,
Brandon
*Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2018 12:05 PM
*Subject:* Re: v3.3 Auto complete broken
Hi Brandon
RM 3630 has already been there and I have sent the patch on pgadmin
hackers where objects belongs to schema other than pg_catalog and public
are not listed. You can apply that patch and test it.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, 21:26 Hibbard, Brandon, <
Hello,
I installed pgAdmin 4 v3.3 today and autocomplete isnât working correctly.
It does not list the tables in a schema or the fields in the table. Is
this a bug or have I done something wrong?
Thanks
Brandon
--
*Akshay Joshi*
*Sr. Software Architect *
*[image: Image removed by sender.]*
*Phone: +91 20-3058-9517 Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
--
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Toshniwal
Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Software Solutions | Pune
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a tree"